India vs Lebanon: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- India
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 23.75 kg/ha against 23.49 kg/ha in India, a difference of 0.26 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
India ranks 108th and Lebanon ranks 106th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.78 kg/ha | 8.86 kg/ha | 0.0835 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 10.57 kg/ha | 18.13 kg/ha | 7.56 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 13.96 kg/ha | 26.1 kg/ha | 12.14 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 16.92 kg/ha | 19.4 kg/ha | 2.48 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 22.73 kg/ha | 31.76 kg/ha | 9.03 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 25.28 kg/ha | 36.83 kg/ha | 11.55 kg/ha | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 25.19 kg/ha | 24.35 kg/ha | 0.8408 kg/ha | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, India or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 23.75 kg/ha against 23.49 kg/ha in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between India and Lebanon?
- 0.26 kg/ha, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do India and Lebanon rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- India ranks 108th and Lebanon ranks 106th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).