Iraq vs Libya: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Iraq
- Libya
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 4.26 kg/ha against 3.35 kg/ha in Libya, a difference of 0.91 kg/ha.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 189th and Libya ranks 190th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 5 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.31 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | 1.29 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1970s | 2.32 kg/ha | 1.78 kg/ha | 0.5404 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1980s | 2.58 kg/ha | 2.18 kg/ha | 0.3934 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1990s | 2.38 kg/ha | 2.92 kg/ha | 0.5418 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2000s | 3.03 kg/ha | 3.2 kg/ha | 0.1713 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 3.76 kg/ha | 2.98 kg/ha | 0.7799 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 2020s | 4.31 kg/ha | 3.07 kg/ha | 1.24 kg/ha | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Iraq or Libya?
- Iraq, at 4.26 kg/ha against 3.35 kg/ha in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Iraq and Libya?
- 0.91 kg/ha, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Libya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Libya rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Iraq ranks 189th and Libya ranks 190th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).