Iraq vs Mozambique: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Iraq
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 4.46 kg/ha against 4.26 kg/ha in Iraq, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 189th and Mozambique ranks 188th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 3 and Mozambique in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.31 kg/ha | 2.1 kg/ha | 0.2117 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 1970s | 2.32 kg/ha | 2.53 kg/ha | 0.2145 kg/ha | Mozambique |
| 1980s | 2.58 kg/ha | 3.27 kg/ha | 0.6938 kg/ha | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 2.38 kg/ha | 4.05 kg/ha | 1.67 kg/ha | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 3.03 kg/ha | 4.05 kg/ha | 1.02 kg/ha | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 3.76 kg/ha | 3.48 kg/ha | 0.2787 kg/ha | Iraq |
| 2020s | 4.31 kg/ha | 4.29 kg/ha | 0.0181 kg/ha | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Iraq or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 4.46 kg/ha against 4.26 kg/ha in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Iraq and Mozambique?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Mozambique?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iraq and Mozambique rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Iraq ranks 189th and Mozambique ranks 188th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).