Italy vs Tuvalu: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Italy
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Italy currently reports 53.02 kg/ha against 51.03 kg/ha in Tuvalu, a difference of 1.99 kg/ha.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 56th and Tuvalu ranks 58th of 201 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 47.49 kg/ha | 18.77 kg/ha | 28.72 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1970s | 65.16 kg/ha | 19.01 kg/ha | 46.16 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1980s | 75.75 kg/ha | 26.33 kg/ha | 49.42 kg/ha | Italy |
| 1990s | 73.9 kg/ha | 40.69 kg/ha | 33.21 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2000s | 64.6 kg/ha | 49.57 kg/ha | 15.03 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2010s | 56.97 kg/ha | 50.54 kg/ha | 6.43 kg/ha | Italy |
| 2020s | 54.31 kg/ha | 51.09 kg/ha | 3.22 kg/ha | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Italy or Tuvalu?
- Italy, at 53.02 kg/ha against 51.03 kg/ha in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Italy and Tuvalu?
- 1.99 kg/ha, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Italy and Tuvalu rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Italy ranks 56th and Tuvalu ranks 58th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).