Jamaica vs Malawi: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Jamaica
- Malawi
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 27.02 kg/ha against 25.04 kg/ha in Malawi, a difference of 1.98 kg/ha.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Jamaica has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 104th of 201 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 35.18 kg/ha | 3 kg/ha | 32.18 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 42.28 kg/ha | 3.66 kg/ha | 38.62 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 46.86 kg/ha | 4.91 kg/ha | 41.95 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 49.82 kg/ha | 4.6 kg/ha | 45.23 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 22.71 kg/ha | 6 kg/ha | 16.72 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 29.57 kg/ha | 13.02 kg/ha | 16.55 kg/ha | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 28.41 kg/ha | 23.34 kg/ha | 5.08 kg/ha | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Jamaica or Malawi?
- Jamaica, at 27.02 kg/ha against 25.04 kg/ha in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Jamaica and Malawi?
- 1.98 kg/ha, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Malawi rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Jamaica ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 104th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).