Japan vs Viet Nam: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Japan
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 60.82 kg/ha against 60.09 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 0.73 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 50th and Viet Nam ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 6 and Viet Nam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 93.08 kg/ha | 21.56 kg/ha | 71.52 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 109.71 kg/ha | 22.28 kg/ha | 87.43 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1980s | 111.62 kg/ha | 27.18 kg/ha | 84.44 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1990s | 100.53 kg/ha | 41 kg/ha | 59.53 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2000s | 86.63 kg/ha | 63.6 kg/ha | 23.03 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2010s | 76.45 kg/ha | 68.49 kg/ha | 7.96 kg/ha | Japan |
| 2020s | 65.45 kg/ha | 67.79 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Japan or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 60.82 kg/ha against 60.09 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Japan and Viet Nam?
- 0.73 kg/ha, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Viet Nam rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Japan ranks 50th and Viet Nam ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).