Kazakhstan vs Lesotho: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Lesotho
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 7.51 kg/ha against 6.51 kg/ha in Lesotho, a difference of 1 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 173rd and Lesotho ranks 175th of 201 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.17 kg/ha | 10.88 kg/ha | 2.71 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 6.95 kg/ha | 10.84 kg/ha | 3.89 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 8.06 kg/ha | 9.27 kg/ha | 1.21 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 7.45 kg/ha | 7.48 kg/ha | 0.0262 kg/ha | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Kazakhstan or Lesotho?
- Kazakhstan, at 7.51 kg/ha against 6.51 kg/ha in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Kazakhstan and Lesotho?
- 1 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Lesotho?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Lesotho rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 173rd and Lesotho ranks 175th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).