Kazakhstan vs Mali: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mali
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 7.51 kg/ha against 6.5 kg/ha in Mali, a difference of 1.01 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 173rd and Mali ranks 176th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.17 kg/ha | 5.7 kg/ha | 2.48 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 6.95 kg/ha | 7.19 kg/ha | 0.2346 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 8.06 kg/ha | 7.05 kg/ha | 1.01 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 7.45 kg/ha | 7.15 kg/ha | 0.2946 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Kazakhstan or Mali?
- Kazakhstan, at 7.51 kg/ha against 6.5 kg/ha in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Kazakhstan and Mali?
- 1.01 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mali?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mali rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 173rd and Mali ranks 176th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).