Kenya vs Saudi Arabia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kenya
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 16.6 kg/ha against 16.58 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.02 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 130th and Saudi Arabia ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 6 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.48 kg/ha | 0.7274 kg/ha | 4.75 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1970s | 6.83 kg/ha | 1.23 kg/ha | 5.6 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1980s | 8.72 kg/ha | 7.25 kg/ha | 1.47 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 1990s | 9.62 kg/ha | 4.55 kg/ha | 5.07 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2000s | 10.59 kg/ha | 5.38 kg/ha | 5.21 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2010s | 12.43 kg/ha | 8 kg/ha | 4.43 kg/ha | Kenya |
| 2020s | 13.79 kg/ha | 17.79 kg/ha | 4 kg/ha | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Kenya or Saudi Arabia?
- Kenya, at 16.6 kg/ha against 16.58 kg/ha in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Kenya and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.02 kg/ha, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Saudi Arabia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Saudi Arabia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kenya ranks 130th and Saudi Arabia ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).