Kiribati vs Sudan: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Kiribati
- Sudan
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 5.1 kg/ha against 4.66 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.44 kg/ha.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 174th of 186 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.94 kg/ha | 4.84 kg/ha | 0.0965 kg/ha | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 5.07 kg/ha | 4.67 kg/ha | 0.4004 kg/ha | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Kiribati or Sudan?
- Kiribati, at 5.1 kg/ha against 4.66 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Kiribati and Sudan?
- 0.44 kg/ha, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Sudan rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Kiribati ranks 171st and Sudan ranks 174th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).