Libya vs Sierra Leone: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Libya
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Libya currently reports 3.35 kg/ha against 3.31 kg/ha in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.04 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Libya ranks 190th and Sierra Leone ranks 191st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.03 kg/ha | 2.69 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 1.78 kg/ha | 3.15 kg/ha | 1.37 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 2.18 kg/ha | 3.38 kg/ha | 1.19 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 1990s | 2.92 kg/ha | 3.83 kg/ha | 0.9028 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 3.2 kg/ha | 1.41 kg/ha | 1.79 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2010s | 2.98 kg/ha | 2.52 kg/ha | 0.4571 kg/ha | Libya |
| 2020s | 3.07 kg/ha | 3.33 kg/ha | 0.2657 kg/ha | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Libya or Sierra Leone?
- Libya, at 3.35 kg/ha against 3.31 kg/ha in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Libya and Sierra Leone?
- 0.04 kg/ha, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Sierra Leone rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Libya ranks 190th and Sierra Leone ranks 191st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).