Lithuania vs Sweden: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 30.67 kg/ha against 29.29 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 1.38 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 89th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.09 kg/ha | 43.37 kg/ha | 8.28 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 42.14 kg/ha | 38.11 kg/ha | 4.03 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 35.36 kg/ha | 34.06 kg/ha | 1.3 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 31.61 kg/ha | 32.27 kg/ha | 0.6529 kg/ha | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Lithuania or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 30.67 kg/ha against 29.29 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Lithuania and Sweden?
- 1.38 kg/ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Sweden rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 89th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).