Luxembourg vs Middle Africa: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Luxembourg
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 100.14 kg/ha against 6.01 kg/ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 94.13 kg/ha.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 16.7 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 28th and Middle Africa ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.92 kg/ha | 4.61 kg/ha | 101.31 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 101.84 kg/ha | 5.03 kg/ha | 96.8 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 99.59 kg/ha | 5.67 kg/ha | 93.92 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Luxembourg or Middle Africa?
- Luxembourg, at 100.14 kg/ha against 6.01 kg/ha in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Luxembourg and Middle Africa?
- 94.13 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Middle Africa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Middle Africa rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Luxembourg ranks 28th and Middle Africa ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).