Luxembourg vs Northern Africa: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Luxembourg
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 100.14 kg/ha against 7.78 kg/ha in Northern Africa, a difference of 92.36 kg/ha.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 12.9 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 27th and Northern Africa ranks 31st of 185 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.92 kg/ha | 6.35 kg/ha | 99.58 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 101.84 kg/ha | 6.87 kg/ha | 94.97 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 99.59 kg/ha | 7.97 kg/ha | 91.63 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Luxembourg or Northern Africa?
- Luxembourg, at 100.14 kg/ha against 7.78 kg/ha in Northern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Luxembourg and Northern Africa?
- 92.36 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Northern Africa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Northern Africa rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Luxembourg ranks 27th and Northern Africa ranks 31st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).