Luxembourg vs Trinidad and Tobago: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Luxembourg
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 101.44 kg/ha against 100.14 kg/ha in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.3 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 27th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 25th of 185 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.92 kg/ha | 70.63 kg/ha | 35.29 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 101.84 kg/ha | 94.55 kg/ha | 7.28 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 99.59 kg/ha | 98.9 kg/ha | 0.6952 kg/ha | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Luxembourg or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 101.44 kg/ha against 100.14 kg/ha in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Luxembourg and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.3 kg/ha, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Luxembourg ranks 27th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 25th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).