Madagascar vs Rwanda: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Madagascar
- Rwanda
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 11.27 kg/ha against 11.15 kg/ha in Rwanda, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 150th and Rwanda ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10.15 kg/ha | 3.11 kg/ha | 7.04 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 9.99 kg/ha | 3.11 kg/ha | 6.88 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 10.83 kg/ha | 3.21 kg/ha | 7.62 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 10.39 kg/ha | 3.44 kg/ha | 6.95 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 8.45 kg/ha | 5.76 kg/ha | 2.68 kg/ha | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 10.47 kg/ha | 10.53 kg/ha | 0.0633 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 10.86 kg/ha | 12.03 kg/ha | 1.17 kg/ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Madagascar or Rwanda?
- Madagascar, at 11.27 kg/ha against 11.15 kg/ha in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Madagascar and Rwanda?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Madagascar and Rwanda rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Madagascar ranks 150th and Rwanda ranks 152nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).