Malaysia vs Malta: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Malaysia
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 143.96 kg/ha against 132.36 kg/ha in Malaysia, a difference of 11.6 kg/ha.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
Malaysia ranks 19th and Malta ranks 16th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.22 kg/ha | 57.21 kg/ha | 44.99 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1970s | 29.77 kg/ha | 89.1 kg/ha | 59.33 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 52.12 kg/ha | 126.73 kg/ha | 74.62 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 82.51 kg/ha | 176.37 kg/ha | 93.86 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 99.06 kg/ha | 198.41 kg/ha | 99.35 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 120.42 kg/ha | 135.68 kg/ha | 15.26 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 112.16 kg/ha | 140.83 kg/ha | 28.67 kg/ha | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Malaysia or Malta?
- Malta, at 143.96 kg/ha against 132.36 kg/ha in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Malaysia and Malta?
- 11.6 kg/ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Malta rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Malaysia ranks 19th and Malta ranks 16th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).