Maldives vs Uganda: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Maldives
- Uganda
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 10.19 kg/ha against 9.65 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.54 kg/ha.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Maldives ranks 158th and Uganda ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8929 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1970s | 0.6417 kg/ha | 2.34 kg/ha | 1.69 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1980s | 0.5374 kg/ha | 2.33 kg/ha | 1.79 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1990s | 0.5314 kg/ha | 3.82 kg/ha | 3.29 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 2000s | 7.31 kg/ha | 5.3 kg/ha | 2.01 kg/ha | Maldives |
| 2010s | 9.3 kg/ha | 7.5 kg/ha | 1.8 kg/ha | Maldives |
| 2020s | 9.47 kg/ha | 9.42 kg/ha | 0.0493 kg/ha | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Maldives or Uganda?
- Maldives, at 10.19 kg/ha against 9.65 kg/ha in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Maldives and Uganda?
- 0.54 kg/ha, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Maldives and Uganda rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Maldives ranks 158th and Uganda ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).