Malta vs Qatar: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Malta
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 161 kg/ha against 143.96 kg/ha in Malta, a difference of 17.04 kg/ha.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.
Malta ranks 16th and Qatar ranks 15th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 5 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 57.21 kg/ha | 97.94 kg/ha | 40.72 kg/ha | Qatar |
| 1970s | 89.1 kg/ha | 73.83 kg/ha | 15.27 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1980s | 126.73 kg/ha | 20.64 kg/ha | 106.09 kg/ha | Malta |
| 1990s | 176.37 kg/ha | 28.2 kg/ha | 148.17 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 198.41 kg/ha | 57.33 kg/ha | 141.09 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 135.68 kg/ha | 99.91 kg/ha | 35.77 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 140.83 kg/ha | 147.44 kg/ha | 6.61 kg/ha | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Malta or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 161 kg/ha against 143.96 kg/ha in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Malta and Qatar?
- 17.04 kg/ha, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Qatar rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Malta ranks 16th and Qatar ranks 15th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).