Malta vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Malta
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Malta currently reports 143.96 kg/ha against 132.6 kg/ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 11.36 kg/ha.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 16th and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 201 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 183.33 kg/ha | 47.95 kg/ha | 135.38 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2000s | 198.41 kg/ha | 50.78 kg/ha | 147.64 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2010s | 135.68 kg/ha | 92.83 kg/ha | 42.85 kg/ha | Malta |
| 2020s | 140.83 kg/ha | 121.37 kg/ha | 19.46 kg/ha | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Malta or Uzbekistan?
- Malta, at 143.96 kg/ha against 132.6 kg/ha in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Malta and Uzbekistan?
- 11.36 kg/ha, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Malta ranks 16th and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).