Mauritius vs North Macedonia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Mauritius
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 33.67 kg/ha against 32.35 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 1.32 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 86th and North Macedonia ranks 87th of 201 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 128.18 kg/ha | 44.7 kg/ha | 83.49 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 140.06 kg/ha | 45.47 kg/ha | 94.59 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 88 kg/ha | 49.07 kg/ha | 38.94 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 41.75 kg/ha | 37.78 kg/ha | 3.97 kg/ha | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Mauritius or North Macedonia?
- Mauritius, at 33.67 kg/ha against 32.35 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Mauritius and North Macedonia?
- 1.32 kg/ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and North Macedonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and North Macedonia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Mauritius ranks 86th and North Macedonia ranks 87th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).