New Caledonia vs Slovenia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- New Caledonia
- Slovenia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 118.35 kg/ha against 109.53 kg/ha in Slovenia, a difference of 8.82 kg/ha.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 22nd and Slovenia ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 80.03 kg/ha | 186.62 kg/ha | 106.59 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 108.08 kg/ha | 162.88 kg/ha | 54.8 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 114.74 kg/ha | 113.36 kg/ha | 1.38 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 119.07 kg/ha | 107.59 kg/ha | 11.48 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, New Caledonia or Slovenia?
- New Caledonia, at 118.35 kg/ha against 109.53 kg/ha in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between New Caledonia and Slovenia?
- 8.82 kg/ha, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do New Caledonia and Slovenia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- New Caledonia ranks 22nd and Slovenia ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).