Niger vs Tunisia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Niger
- Tunisia
How they compare
Niger currently reports 2.7 kg/ha against 2.65 kg/ha in Tunisia, a difference of 0.05 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.
Niger ranks 194th and Tunisia ranks 196th of 201 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.8872 kg/ha | 1.48 kg/ha | 0.59 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 1.16 kg/ha | 1.66 kg/ha | 0.5006 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 1.36 kg/ha | 1.82 kg/ha | 0.4645 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 1.27 kg/ha | 2.02 kg/ha | 0.7536 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 1.7 kg/ha | 2.77 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 2.08 kg/ha | 2.94 kg/ha | 0.8546 kg/ha | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 2.65 kg/ha | 3.18 kg/ha | 0.5328 kg/ha | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Niger or Tunisia?
- Niger, at 2.7 kg/ha against 2.65 kg/ha in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Niger and Tunisia?
- 0.05 kg/ha, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Niger and Tunisia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Niger ranks 194th and Tunisia ranks 196th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).