North Macedonia vs Sweden: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- North Macedonia
- Sweden
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 32.35 kg/ha against 30.67 kg/ha in Sweden, a difference of 1.68 kg/ha.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 87th and Sweden ranks 89th of 201 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.7 kg/ha | 43.37 kg/ha | 1.33 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 45.47 kg/ha | 38.11 kg/ha | 7.36 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 49.07 kg/ha | 34.06 kg/ha | 15 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 37.78 kg/ha | 32.27 kg/ha | 5.51 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, North Macedonia or Sweden?
- North Macedonia, at 32.35 kg/ha against 30.67 kg/ha in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between North Macedonia and Sweden?
- 1.68 kg/ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Sweden rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- North Macedonia ranks 87th and Sweden ranks 89th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).