Northern Africa vs Slovenia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Northern Africa
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 109.53 kg/ha against 7.78 kg/ha in Northern Africa, a difference of 101.75 kg/ha.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 14.1 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Northern Africa ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 24th of 29 groups.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.16 kg/ha | 186.62 kg/ha | 181.45 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 6.35 kg/ha | 162.88 kg/ha | 156.54 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 6.87 kg/ha | 113.36 kg/ha | 106.49 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 7.97 kg/ha | 107.59 kg/ha | 99.62 kg/ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Northern Africa or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 109.53 kg/ha against 7.78 kg/ha in Northern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Northern Africa and Slovenia?
- 101.75 kg/ha, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern Africa and Slovenia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Northern Africa ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 24th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).