Northern Africa vs Tajikistan: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Northern Africa
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 91.65 kg/ha against 7.78 kg/ha in Northern Africa, a difference of 83.87 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 11.8 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Northern Africa ranks 27th and Tajikistan ranks 31st of 29 groups.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.16 kg/ha | 48.11 kg/ha | 42.95 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 6.35 kg/ha | 57.25 kg/ha | 50.9 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 6.87 kg/ha | 86.35 kg/ha | 79.48 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 7.97 kg/ha | 92.59 kg/ha | 84.63 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Northern Africa or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 91.65 kg/ha against 7.78 kg/ha in Northern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Northern Africa and Tajikistan?
- 83.87 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Northern Africa and Tajikistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Northern Africa ranks 27th and Tajikistan ranks 31st of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).