South Sudan vs Saint Lucia: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- South Sudan
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 27.41 kg/ha against 27.02 kg/ha in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.39 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
South Sudan ranks 100th and Saint Lucia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24.13 kg/ha | 32.46 kg/ha | 8.32 kg/ha | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 27.63 kg/ha | 26.96 kg/ha | 0.6779 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, South Sudan or Saint Lucia?
- South Sudan, at 27.41 kg/ha against 27.02 kg/ha in Saint Lucia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between South Sudan and Saint Lucia?
- 0.39 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Saint Lucia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Saint Lucia rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- South Sudan ranks 100th and Saint Lucia ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).