Sri Lanka vs USSR: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Sri Lanka
- USSR
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 18.49 kg/ha against 17.51 kg/ha in USSR, a difference of 0.98 kg/ha.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times USSR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 126th and USSR ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25.02 kg/ha | 10.25 kg/ha | 14.77 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 21.96 kg/ha | 15.39 kg/ha | 6.57 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 33.72 kg/ha | 19.07 kg/ha | 14.65 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 32 kg/ha | 17.61 kg/ha | 14.39 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Sri Lanka or USSR?
- Sri Lanka, at 18.49 kg/ha against 17.51 kg/ha in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Sri Lanka and USSR?
- 0.98 kg/ha, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Sri Lanka and USSR rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Sri Lanka ranks 126th and USSR ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).