Tajikistan vs Western Africa: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Tajikistan
- Western Africa
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 91.65 kg/ha against 5.54 kg/ha in Western Africa, a difference of 86.11 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 16.5 times Western Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Tajikistan ranks 31st and Western Africa ranks 35th of 185 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Western Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.11 kg/ha | 4 kg/ha | 44.11 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 57.25 kg/ha | 4.37 kg/ha | 52.88 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 86.35 kg/ha | 5.33 kg/ha | 81.02 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 92.59 kg/ha | 5.93 kg/ha | 86.66 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Tajikistan or Western Africa?
- Tajikistan, at 91.65 kg/ha against 5.54 kg/ha in Western Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Tajikistan and Western Africa?
- 86.11 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Western Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Tajikistan and Western Africa rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Tajikistan ranks 31st and Western Africa ranks 35th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).