Togo vs Yemen: Input — Cropland potassium per unit area
Input — Cropland potassium per unit area over time
- Togo
- Yemen
How they compare
Togo currently reports 7.73 kg/ha against 6.72 kg/ha in Yemen, a difference of 1.01 kg/ha.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.2 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Yemen ahead.
Togo ranks 158th and Yemen ranks 161st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.38 kg/ha | 2.7 kg/ha | 1.32 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1970s | 1.67 kg/ha | 2.15 kg/ha | 0.4765 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1980s | 2.35 kg/ha | 2.54 kg/ha | 0.187 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 1990s | 3.26 kg/ha | 3 kg/ha | 0.255 kg/ha | Togo |
| 2000s | 3.39 kg/ha | 4.36 kg/ha | 0.9741 kg/ha | Yemen |
| 2010s | 5.92 kg/ha | 5.76 kg/ha | 0.1619 kg/ha | Togo |
| 2020s | 6.21 kg/ha | 6.62 kg/ha | 0.4192 kg/ha | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium per unit area, Togo or Yemen?
- Togo, at 7.73 kg/ha against 6.72 kg/ha in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium per unit area between Togo and Yemen?
- 1.01 kg/ha, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Togo and Yemen rank globally for input — cropland potassium per unit area?
- Togo ranks 158th and Yemen ranks 161st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).