Africa vs Belarus: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Africa
- Belarus
How they compare
Africa currently reports 2.39 million t against 519,436 t in Belarus, a difference of 1.87 million t.
That makes Africa's figure about 4.6 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Africa has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 18th and Belarus ranks 21st of 32 groups.
Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.18 million t | 553,320 t | 625,473 t | Africa |
| 2000s | 1.44 million t | 528,200 t | 911,094 t | Africa |
| 2010s | 1.96 million t | 567,783 t | 1.39 million t | Africa |
| 2020s | 2.40 million t | 514,979 t | 1.88 million t | Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Africa or Belarus?
- Africa, at 2.39 million t against 519,436 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Africa and Belarus?
- 1.87 million t, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Belarus?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Belarus rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Africa ranks 18th and Belarus ranks 21st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).