Albania vs El Salvador: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Albania
- El Salvador
How they compare
Albania currently reports 29,813 t against 27,907 t in El Salvador, a difference of 1,906 t.
That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 111th and El Salvador ranks 113th of 201 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,965 t | 19,884 t | 9,081 t | Albania |
| 1970s | 33,476 t | 22,815 t | 10,662 t | Albania |
| 1980s | 43,988 t | 18,179 t | 25,809 t | Albania |
| 1990s | 54,817 t | 22,972 t | 31,845 t | Albania |
| 2000s | 53,640 t | 27,007 t | 26,633 t | Albania |
| 2010s | 45,719 t | 28,163 t | 17,556 t | Albania |
| 2020s | 35,788 t | 29,228 t | 6,560 t | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Albania or El Salvador?
- Albania, at 29,813 t against 27,907 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Albania and El Salvador?
- 1,906 t, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and El Salvador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Albania and El Salvador rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Albania ranks 111th and El Salvador ranks 113th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).