Angola vs Madagascar: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Angola
- Madagascar
How they compare
Angola currently reports 48,040 t against 40,563 t in Madagascar, a difference of 7,477 t.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Madagascar's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Angola ranks 97th and Madagascar ranks 100th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,552 t | 22,824 t | 16,272 t | Madagascar |
| 1970s | 11,830 t | 26,411 t | 14,581 t | Madagascar |
| 1980s | 13,178 t | 34,340 t | 21,162 t | Madagascar |
| 1990s | 13,848 t | 35,780 t | 21,932 t | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 20,826 t | 30,184 t | 9,358 t | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 42,371 t | 37,690 t | 4,681 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 48,257 t | 39,096 t | 9,162 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Angola or Madagascar?
- Angola, at 48,040 t against 40,563 t in Madagascar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Angola and Madagascar?
- 7,477 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Madagascar rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Angola ranks 97th and Madagascar ranks 100th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).