Angola vs Zambia: Input — Cropland potassium

Angola
48,040 t
in 2023
Zambia
48,904 t
in 2023
Angola rank
97th
Zambia rank
95th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Angola
  • Zambia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 48,904 t against 48,040 t in Angola, a difference of 864 t.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 97th and Zambia ranks 95th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 6,552 t 4,809 t 1,743 t Angola
1970s 11,830 t 9,799 t 2,032 t Angola
1980s 13,178 t 12,001 t 1,177 t Angola
1990s 13,848 t 14,434 t 585.99 t Zambia
2000s 20,826 t 22,281 t 1,455 t Zambia
2010s 42,371 t 34,588 t 7,783 t Angola
2020s 48,257 t 54,606 t 6,349 t Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Angola or Zambia?
Zambia, at 48,904 t against 48,040 t in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Angola and Zambia?
864 t, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Zambia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Angola ranks 97th and Zambia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).