Argentina vs Romania: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Argentina
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 245,753 t against 208,537 t in Argentina, a difference of 37,216 t.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Argentina ranks 39th and Romania ranks 36th of 201 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 182,378 t | 337,014 t | 154,636 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 209,474 t | 464,493 t | 255,019 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 221,085 t | 667,956 t | 446,871 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 200,561 t | 356,376 t | 155,815 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 206,865 t | 260,208 t | 53,344 t | Romania |
| 2010s | 228,702 t | 243,313 t | 14,612 t | Romania |
| 2020s | 225,354 t | 249,752 t | 24,399 t | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Argentina or Romania?
- Romania, at 245,753 t against 208,537 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Argentina and Romania?
- 37,216 t, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Romania rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Argentina ranks 39th and Romania ranks 36th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).