Armenia vs Fiji: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Armenia
- Fiji
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 5,162 t against 4,760 t in Fiji, a difference of 402 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 153rd and Fiji ranks 156th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,114 t | 7,444 t | 1,330 t | Fiji |
| 2000s | 3,890 t | 4,011 t | 120.84 t | Fiji |
| 2010s | 4,650 t | 3,721 t | 928.63 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 5,322 t | 3,771 t | 1,551 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Armenia or Fiji?
- Armenia, at 5,162 t against 4,760 t in Fiji as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Armenia and Fiji?
- 402 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Fiji?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Fiji rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Armenia ranks 153rd and Fiji ranks 156th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).