Armenia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Armenia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 5,162 t against 4,767 t in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 395 t.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 153rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,114 t | 3,848 t | 2,266 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 3,890 t | 3,525 t | 365.57 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 4,650 t | 4,444 t | 205.7 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 5,322 t | 4,648 t | 673.87 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Armenia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Armenia, at 5,162 t against 4,767 t in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Armenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 395 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Armenia ranks 153rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).