Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Input β€” Cropland potassium

Australia and New Zealand
382,824 t
in 2023
Mexico
486,726 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
25th
Mexico rank
23rd

Input β€” Cropland potassium over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Mexico
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 486,726 t against 382,824 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 103,902 t.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Mexico ranks 23rd of 185 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 192,515 t 147,639 t 44,876 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 263,038 t 222,411 t 40,627 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 259,722 t 311,760 t 52,038 t Mexico
1990s 311,416 t 322,130 t 10,713 t Mexico
2000s 344,435 t 419,396 t 74,961 t Mexico
2010s 347,456 t 492,167 t 144,711 t Mexico
2020s 392,488 t 531,668 t 139,180 t Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input β€” cropland potassium, Australia and New Zealand or Mexico?
Mexico, at 486,726 t against 382,824 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in input β€” cropland potassium between Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
103,902 t, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Mexico rank globally for input β€” cropland potassium?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Mexico ranks 23rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β€” Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Input β€” Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/australia-and-new-zealand/mexico/">Australia and New Zealand vs Mexico: Input β€” Cropland potassium</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input β€” Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).