Australia and New Zealand vs Ukraine: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Ukraine
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 382,824 t against 379,194 t in Ukraine, a difference of 3,630 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 324,519 t | 1.21 million t | 885,027 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 344,435 t | 593,594 t | 249,159 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 347,456 t | 548,860 t | 201,405 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 392,488 t | 474,240 t | 81,752 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Australia and New Zealand or Ukraine?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 382,824 t against 379,194 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Australia and New Zealand and Ukraine?
- 3,630 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Ukraine rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).