Australia and New Zealand vs United Republic of Tanzania: Input — Cropland potassium

Australia and New Zealand
382,824 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
119,469 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
25th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
9th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 382,824 t against 119,469 t in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 263,355 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 3.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 186 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 192,515 t 22,977 t 169,537 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 263,038 t 29,485 t 233,553 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 259,722 t 35,352 t 224,370 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 311,416 t 42,929 t 268,487 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 344,435 t 58,372 t 286,063 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 347,456 t 86,294 t 261,162 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 392,488 t 113,956 t 278,532 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Australia and New Zealand or United Republic of Tanzania?
Australia and New Zealand, at 382,824 t against 119,469 t in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Australia and New Zealand and United Republic of Tanzania?
263,355 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 25th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 9th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs United Republic of Tanzania: Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/australia-and-new-zealand/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/australia-and-new-zealand/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Australia and New Zealand vs United Republic of Tanzania: Input — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).