Australia vs Czechoslovakia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 355,352 t against 295,759 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 59,593 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 28th and Czechoslovakia ranks 31st of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 174,579 t | 629,321 t | 454,742 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 239,109 t | 884,285 t | 645,176 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 238,568 t | 838,325 t | 599,757 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 240,309 t | 435,336 t | 195,027 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Australia or Czechoslovakia?
- Australia, at 355,352 t against 295,759 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Australia and Czechoslovakia?
- 59,593 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Australia and Czechoslovakia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Australia ranks 28th and Czechoslovakia ranks 31st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).