Australia vs Philippines: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Australia
- Philippines
How they compare
Australia currently reports 355,352 t against 341,782 t in Philippines, a difference of 13,570 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 28th and Philippines ranks 29th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 174,579 t | 154,757 t | 19,822 t | Australia |
| 1970s | 239,109 t | 190,076 t | 49,033 t | Australia |
| 1980s | 238,568 t | 175,788 t | 62,780 t | Australia |
| 1990s | 286,466 t | 213,150 t | 73,316 t | Australia |
| 2000s | 315,684 t | 267,100 t | 48,584 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 316,967 t | 288,051 t | 28,916 t | Australia |
| 2020s | 362,345 t | 365,031 t | 2,686 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Australia or Philippines?
- Australia, at 355,352 t against 341,782 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Australia and Philippines?
- 13,570 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Philippines rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Australia ranks 28th and Philippines ranks 29th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).