Austria vs Guatemala: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Austria
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 127,070 t against 118,669 t in Austria, a difference of 8,401 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 53rd and Guatemala ranks 50th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 6 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 255,894 t | 20,795 t | 235,100 t | Austria |
| 1970s | 261,731 t | 34,368 t | 227,363 t | Austria |
| 1980s | 243,854 t | 37,332 t | 206,522 t | Austria |
| 1990s | 187,881 t | 55,430 t | 132,451 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 145,642 t | 75,949 t | 69,693 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 131,659 t | 123,555 t | 8,104 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 120,474 t | 138,544 t | 18,069 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Austria or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 127,070 t against 118,669 t in Austria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Austria and Guatemala?
- 8,401 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Guatemala?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Guatemala rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Austria ranks 53rd and Guatemala ranks 50th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).