Austria vs Malawi: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Austria
- Malawi
How they compare
Austria currently reports 118,669 t against 105,159 t in Malawi, a difference of 13,510 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 58th and Malawi ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 255,894 t | 4,977 t | 250,918 t | Austria |
| 1970s | 261,731 t | 7,575 t | 254,156 t | Austria |
| 1980s | 243,854 t | 10,730 t | 233,125 t | Austria |
| 1990s | 187,881 t | 11,475 t | 176,407 t | Austria |
| 2000s | 145,642 t | 19,818 t | 125,824 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 131,659 t | 50,317 t | 81,343 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 120,474 t | 97,614 t | 22,861 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Austria or Malawi?
- Austria, at 118,669 t against 105,159 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Austria and Malawi?
- 13,510 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Malawi?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Malawi rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Austria ranks 58th and Malawi ranks 61st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).