Azerbaijan vs Burundi: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Azerbaijan
- Burundi
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 22,185 t against 19,795 t in Burundi, a difference of 2,390 t.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 123rd and Burundi ranks 126th of 201 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,164 t | 2,876 t | 12,288 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 17,067 t | 3,056 t | 14,011 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 20,165 t | 9,131 t | 11,034 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 23,104 t | 17,684 t | 5,420 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Azerbaijan or Burundi?
- Azerbaijan, at 22,185 t against 19,795 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Azerbaijan and Burundi?
- 2,390 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Burundi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Burundi rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Azerbaijan ranks 123rd and Burundi ranks 126th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).