Azerbaijan vs Haiti: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Azerbaijan
- Haiti
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 22,185 t against 21,640 t in Haiti, a difference of 545 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 112th and Haiti ranks 114th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Haiti in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,164 t | 14,835 t | 328.91 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 17,067 t | 20,924 t | 3,857 t | Haiti |
| 2010s | 20,165 t | 32,005 t | 11,840 t | Haiti |
| 2020s | 23,104 t | 22,593 t | 510.72 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Azerbaijan or Haiti?
- Azerbaijan, at 22,185 t against 21,640 t in Haiti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Azerbaijan and Haiti?
- 545 t, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Haiti?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Haiti rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Azerbaijan ranks 112th and Haiti ranks 114th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).