Azerbaijan vs Iraq: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Azerbaijan
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 23,386 t against 22,185 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 1,201 t.
That makes Iraq's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 123rd and Iraq ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,164 t | 12,152 t | 3,013 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 17,067 t | 13,812 t | 3,255 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 20,165 t | 18,714 t | 1,451 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 23,104 t | 23,620 t | 515.72 t | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Azerbaijan or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 23,386 t against 22,185 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Azerbaijan and Iraq?
- 1,201 t, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Iraq?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Iraq rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Azerbaijan ranks 123rd and Iraq ranks 122nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).