Bahamas vs Guadeloupe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Bahamas
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 471.86 t against 358.12 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 113.74 t.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.3 times Guadeloupe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.
Bahamas ranks 166th and Guadeloupe ranks 169th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Guadeloupe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 372.17 t | 4,373 t | 4,000 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 513.32 t | 3,323 t | 2,809 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 346.26 t | 2,944 t | 2,598 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 340.4 t | 2,951 t | 2,610 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 455.01 t | 1,283 t | 828.24 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2010s | 609.86 t | 300.62 t | 309.24 t | Bahamas |
| 2020s | 470.94 t | 347.97 t | 122.97 t | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Bahamas or Guadeloupe?
- Bahamas, at 471.86 t against 358.12 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Bahamas and Guadeloupe?
- 113.74 t, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Guadeloupe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Guadeloupe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Bahamas ranks 166th and Guadeloupe ranks 169th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).