Bahamas vs Solomon Islands: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Bahamas
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 491.08 t against 471.86 t in Bahamas, a difference of 19.22 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 180th and Solomon Islands ranks 179th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 372.17 t | 207.2 t | 164.96 t | Bahamas |
| 1970s | 513.32 t | 379.14 t | 134.18 t | Bahamas |
| 1980s | 346.26 t | 447.17 t | 100.91 t | Solomon Islands |
| 1990s | 340.4 t | 442.16 t | 101.76 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 455.01 t | 486.17 t | 31.15 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 609.86 t | 983.68 t | 373.82 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 470.94 t | 847.89 t | 376.95 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Bahamas or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 491.08 t against 471.86 t in Bahamas as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Bahamas and Solomon Islands?
- 19.22 t, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Solomon Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bahamas and Solomon Islands rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Bahamas ranks 180th and Solomon Islands ranks 179th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).