Bangladesh vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Input — Cropland potassium

Bangladesh
706,334 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.32 million t
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
15th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
13th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 3.32 million t against 706,334 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 2.61 million t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 4.7 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th of 186 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 122,631 t 907,505 t 784,874 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 154,392 t 1.19 million t 1.03 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 168,842 t 1.36 million t 1.19 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 249,304 t 1.43 million t 1.18 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 321,461 t 1.80 million t 1.48 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 537,329 t 2.67 million t 2.13 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 657,771 t 3.19 million t 2.54 million t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Bangladesh or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 3.32 million t against 706,334 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Bangladesh and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
2.61 million t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Bangladesh ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/bangladesh/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/bangladesh/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Bangladesh vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Input — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).